Classical Music  » 10 Music Download Legal Points

10 Music Download Legal Points

Everybody's doing it: downloading music and sharing files.

People who share music files on the Internet argue that

downloading is legal; today they can be sued by the record

industry. Can one be sued without a great intrusion into

personal lives of an individual?

1. Enjoy music downloads from safe and legal sources. Get the

facts and not the scare tactics, about online music services.

2. The prosecution has to able to prove, with adequate

evidence, that the IP address used for music downloads can be

linked to the person accused of illegal content sharing. There

is a growing concern for "privacy". Legal experts worry about

the "intrusiveness" of Internet monitoring in order to prove a

court case.

3. These IP address--numbers--given to user by the ISPs are

dynamic and change rapidly. The starting point is to establish

that there is enough bona fide evidence to prosecute.

4. It is difficult to a pin an IP address on any one person.

The IP numbers that some ISPs assign to their users can change

from one "session" to the next. The music industry must be able

mean copyright law does not protect "content". For sure,...

to link file-sharers to specific IP addresses at the times those

addresses were used for file sharing.

5. Since their are personal freedoms involved, the courts want

to make sure that the individual is revealed to the public.

6. These copyright allegation lawsuits are a minefield, because

they involve the personal information of the defendant.

7. In Canada, under its privacy laws, people are protected

through court confidentiality orders. In the United States, the

Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) must get a

order to reveal the downloader's identity.

8. It is difficult to give a definitive decision on the

interpretation copyright law itself.

9. The legal tactics of the U.S. recording industry, which have

been suing individuals for sharing music on-line. The entire

music industry has changed dramatically. Since file sharing

began, there has been an increase in the popularity of DVDs and

video games that have put recording sales revenue in a slump.

10. The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA)

desires the industry be compensated for losses due to copying,

but what decision would make it a flat-out victory. Can the

recording industry prove that its bottom line was really

affected by file-sharing. In the U.S. the RIAA can sue for

statutory damages of $750 per song on a file-sharer's hard

drive. But look dramatic price cuts by "big box" retailers.

Once selling music files for charging 99 cents a song was the

norm, now look at Yahoo who now offers $60 a year for all you

can eat program. How can the RIAA or CRIA claim such high

damages?

Downloading music has been around only a few years and is still

evolving. A good road map is needed for what we have to do in

the future in the area of copyright on the Internet. It doesn't

mean copyright law does not protect "content". For sure,

whatever rulings are arrived at, will have long-term effects for

us all.

About the Author

is dedicated to offering news, articles, and instruction on

online music downloads. You have a definite choice of music

sources online. Visit http://www.anymusicdownlo

ad.com for more information.